Program Review at UNC-Chapel Hill

Conducted by the Office of the Provost and The Graduate School


“The primary purpose of all program review is the improvement of . . . programs as measured by the quality of the faculty, the students, library and other educational resources, the curriculum, available facilities, and the academic reputation of the program among its peers . . . It helps set goals and directions for the future . . . [and] also provides a mechanism for change”

Academic Review of Graduate Programs (Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, 1990), p. 3

Program review is:

  • Internal, initiated and administered by the university
  • Evaluative, not just descriptive
  • Forward-looking, directed toward program improvement, not simply assessment
  • Based on academic criteria
  • As objective as possible
  • Independent of other reviews (e.g., accreditation, licensing), with recommendations directed to faculty and university administrators
  • Intended to result in action – a plan to implement desired changes, if possible on a specific agreed-upon timetable.

Program Review provides answers to the following kinds of questions:

  • Is the program advancing the state of the discipline or profession?
  • Is its teaching or training of students useful and effective?
  • Does the program meet the institution’s goals?
  • Does it respond to the profession’s needs?
  • How is the program assessed by experts in the field?

Academic Review of Graduate Programs, pp. 6-7

Please visit Elements of the Program Review, Instructions for Implementing the Self-Study, Suggestions for the Self-Study Outline, Sample Campus Visit Schedules, and Appendix: Review Figures for more information.